Monday, April 30, 2012
"Decisions" with John Wayne
Back in 1973, Duck's Unlimited produced the following video, narrated by John Wayne. Enjoy.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Is This John Wayne?
Well my friends, it seems that Richard M. Roberts, the self-aggrandizing
"film historian" who found it necessary to puff out his over-sized
belly and attack the content of The New Frontier website (see the previous blog
post), has not ceased his attack. Rather than dwell on the most recent rants to
be found on his closed forum (and they are ranting even as I write this, which proves the old adage, "he who shouts loudest is the most
guilty"), however, I will focus only on the post which is directly related to the
question at hand - Is This John Wayne?
One of the pages on The New Frontier website, is titled, Is This John Wayne? As many Wayne fans are aware, John Wayne was involved in a number of films that have never made it into any printed filmographies. The primary reasons for this are 1) Wayne's admission that he worked on so many films back in his early days in Hollywood that he could not remember them all, and 2) the lack of screen credit for each and every extra or crew member (remember, Wayne also did prop works, stunts, lighting, electrical, and more on several films). In the interest of honest research and a desire to attempt to locate some of his previously unknown work, a good number of old films that he may have worked on are being reviewed, often one frame at a time. When a possible sighting of John Wayne is made, a screen shot is taken and those screen shots are posted on The New Frontier.
As you no doubt noticed in the previous blog post, Mr. Roberts has taken exception to the theory that John Wayne appeared in the Lloyd “Ham” Hamilton comedy short, Careful Please. Several screen shots where posted. Mr. Roberts stated that not only did John Wayne not appear in any of those screen shots, but that he actually owned the only existing print of Careful Please, that it was “razor-sharp,” and that all digital prints (DVD’s) of Careful Please had been made from his “razor-sharp” print, but were all unfocused and difficult to see. The obvious question here is, since all the DVD’s were made from his “razor-sharp” print, then why aren’t they “razor-sharp” as well?
I made the point that if Mr. Roberts was so all-fired sure that John Wayne is not shown in the screen shots, then why not post screen shots from his own “razor-sharp” print, and lay to rest any doubts about Wayne’s appearance. Mr. Roberts stated that he did not have a digital copy of his print (from which all existing digital copies had been made), but that he would be will to sell a digital copy of his “razor-sharp” print. (Hmmmmm?) Less than 24 hours after Mr. Roberts posted this, he posted another commentary in which he stated that he had forgotten that he actually did have a digital print of Careful Please, and he promptly posted screen shots. What is very interesting (at least to me), is that the screen shots Mr. Roberts posted to support his claim that Wayne did not appear in the film, all come from the Slap Happy series that Mr. Roberts not only wrote, but was intimately involved with. Now, one would imagine that since he was so involved with the Slap Happy series, that he would ensure that the digital print made from his “razor-sharp” print would be just as clear and just as crisp as his print. Obviously.
So at this time, I will leave you, my friends, to make the decision. Is This John Wayne? Look close and compare the inferior, out-of-focus, blurry screen shot that appears on The New Frontier website, with the “razor-sharp” screen shots provided by Mr. Roberts.
Now, to be fair, Mr. Roberts did say that the screen shots he posted from his "razor-sharp" master print may appear to be a little blurry because they are action shots, as are the screen shots used on The New Frontier website. There are also some comparison photos that are known to be of John Wayne on The New Frontier website with which to compare these screen shots. http://dukefanclub.weebly.com/is-this-john-wayne.html
One of the pages on The New Frontier website, is titled, Is This John Wayne? As many Wayne fans are aware, John Wayne was involved in a number of films that have never made it into any printed filmographies. The primary reasons for this are 1) Wayne's admission that he worked on so many films back in his early days in Hollywood that he could not remember them all, and 2) the lack of screen credit for each and every extra or crew member (remember, Wayne also did prop works, stunts, lighting, electrical, and more on several films). In the interest of honest research and a desire to attempt to locate some of his previously unknown work, a good number of old films that he may have worked on are being reviewed, often one frame at a time. When a possible sighting of John Wayne is made, a screen shot is taken and those screen shots are posted on The New Frontier.
As you no doubt noticed in the previous blog post, Mr. Roberts has taken exception to the theory that John Wayne appeared in the Lloyd “Ham” Hamilton comedy short, Careful Please. Several screen shots where posted. Mr. Roberts stated that not only did John Wayne not appear in any of those screen shots, but that he actually owned the only existing print of Careful Please, that it was “razor-sharp,” and that all digital prints (DVD’s) of Careful Please had been made from his “razor-sharp” print, but were all unfocused and difficult to see. The obvious question here is, since all the DVD’s were made from his “razor-sharp” print, then why aren’t they “razor-sharp” as well?
I made the point that if Mr. Roberts was so all-fired sure that John Wayne is not shown in the screen shots, then why not post screen shots from his own “razor-sharp” print, and lay to rest any doubts about Wayne’s appearance. Mr. Roberts stated that he did not have a digital copy of his print (from which all existing digital copies had been made), but that he would be will to sell a digital copy of his “razor-sharp” print. (Hmmmmm?) Less than 24 hours after Mr. Roberts posted this, he posted another commentary in which he stated that he had forgotten that he actually did have a digital print of Careful Please, and he promptly posted screen shots. What is very interesting (at least to me), is that the screen shots Mr. Roberts posted to support his claim that Wayne did not appear in the film, all come from the Slap Happy series that Mr. Roberts not only wrote, but was intimately involved with. Now, one would imagine that since he was so involved with the Slap Happy series, that he would ensure that the digital print made from his “razor-sharp” print would be just as clear and just as crisp as his print. Obviously.
So at this time, I will leave you, my friends, to make the decision. Is This John Wayne? Look close and compare the inferior, out-of-focus, blurry screen shot that appears on The New Frontier website, with the “razor-sharp” screen shots provided by Mr. Roberts.
Inferior screen shot that appears on The New Frontier (click to enlarge) |
Inferior screen shot that appears on The New Frontier (click to enlarge) |
"Razor-Sharp" screen shot provided by Mr. Roberts (click to enlarge) |
"Razor-Sharp" screen shot provided by Mr. Roberts (click to enlarge) |
"Razor-Sharp" screen shot provided by Mr. Roberts (click to enlarge) |
"Razor-Sharp" screen shot provided by Mr. Roberts (click to enlarge) |
Thursday, April 26, 2012
An Open Letter to Richard M. Roberts (and his loyal sycophantic friends)
Regarding the Silent Comedy Mafia forum thread entitled “John
Wayne NOT in CAREFUL PLEASE with Lloyd Hamilton,” I would like to clarify some
of Mr. Roberts glaring inaccuracies, as well as rebut his inaccurate points and
respond to his obvious “cyber-bullying.” I would have posted this on same forum
used by Mr. Roberts to post his comments, however, Mr. Roberts has made it a
point to post on a closed forum, thereby preventing those who disagree with him
from posting comments that may provide information contrary to Mr. Roberts’s
self-appointed gospel; which, of course, allows Mr. Roberts to appear correct
and knowledgeable.
(Mr. Roberts’s comments regarding the contents of my website
can be found at: http://www.silentcomedymafia.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=627&sid=e81a36501d79b0464d6b564f3e78f463
providing he does not delete them.)
Mr. Roberts is insistent that John Wayne not only is not,
but could
not appear in the Lloyd “Ham” Hamilton silent comedy Careful Please. Mr. Roberts states: (please note I have not
attempted to correct any of Mr. Roberts’s spelling or grammatical errors. I
will leave that to his own overworked editors.)
“Lets just say we're
putting a myth to bed before it spreads: I was glancing over at the other minor
silent comedy newsgroup this morning and saw someone getting all hot and
bothered that they had "discovered" John Wayne as an extra in CAREFUL
PLEASE starring Lloyd Hamilton. John Wayne once reminisced in an interview that
he had done bit parts in several Hamilton comedies when he was starting out,
and that has led this person to look at CAREFUL PLEASE on the Looser than Loose
DVD and determined that it is the Duke in several freeze frames from the looser
Than Loose Transfer…”
Apparently Mr. Roberts has deemed the other silent comedy
newsgroup to be a “minor” forum (SilentComedians.com http://www.silentcomedians.com/forum/index.php ), and therefore somehow inferior to his forum.
Considering that at least one well respected and established author uses this forum,
I would hardly call it a “minor” newsgroup.
Mr. Roberts goes on to say, “as the owner of the razor-sharp original Bell and Howell Show-at-Home printdown that the rather middling dupe of CAREFUL PLEASE that Dave Stevenson used for his LTL video transfer was made from, I pulled the print and looked at it carefully in slow motion, and I hate to say I disagree that it is John Wayne in that scene.”
Congratulations to Mr. Roberts for owning the “razor-sharp
original Bell and Howell Show-at-Home printdown” (which he later states was the
print that all DVD prints have been made from). Unfortunately, Mr. Roberts
fails to post any screen shots from his “razor-sharp” print to substantiate his
claim. We have nothing but his word to go by. Mr. Roberts does offer to sell
interested parties a copy of his print, but without posting proof that his copy
is indeed “razor-sharp” and therefore superior to all other existing prints and
DVDs, we again have nothing to substantiate his claim. Nothing but his
unsubstantiated word. His unsubstantiated opinion.
Mr. Roberts continues his comments by saying, “The last problem is the timing. CAREFUL PLEASE was released February 7, 1926, which means it went into production no later than December,1925, and could have certainly been produced earlier. Wayne was at USC at the time, and did not even get into the movies until Tom MIx got him a summer job as a prop man at Fox in the late Spring/Summer of 1926. CAREFUL PLEASE is just a hair early to be one of the Hamilton comedies Wayne had a bit or extra role in, especially when he remembered doing the Hamilton comedies after he was already at Fox.”
Lloyd “Ham” Hamilton biographer Anthony Balducci stated in
an email that was forwarded to me, that Hamilton’s comedy shorts were usually
in production for one or two months prior to their release. Since Careful
Please was released February 7, 1926, production likely started during December
1925, and probably not before that. Mr. Roberts correctly states that
John Wayne was still at USC during that time, but he is incorrect in his
statement that Wayne “did not even get into the movies until Tom Mix got him a
summer job as a propman at Fox in the late Spring/Summer of 1926.” If Mr.
Roberts had bothered to do his homework before offering this statement, he
would have known that John Wayne appeared in at least two films before
working at Fox or on Mix’s Great K&A Train Robbery. Those films are Bardeley’s the Magnificent and Brown of Harvard, both produced at MGM
before production commenced on K&A.
Throughout Mr. Roberts’s comments, he continues to hammer home his belief that Wayne could not have appeared in Careful Please. Roberts states: “The facts are this. Wayne recalled first meeting John Ford on the set of MOTHER MACHREE while Wayne was working as a propman handling geese in the picture. MOTHER MACHREE’s principal photography and production dates are from August 24 to October 14, 1926. CAREFUL PLEASE was shot sometime in November-December 1925. It is absolutely impossible that Wayne could have been in a Lloyd Hamilton picture nearly a year before he met Ford if he was introduced to Hamilton by Ford. …
“In the two interviews in which John Wayne ever mentioned Lloyd Hamilton, he mentioned that he had bit roles in Hamilton’s comedies AFTER he began working at Fox as a propman. In the interview she quotes Wayne as saying “I finally got bit parts in a few other films. Ham Hamilton was the director of those films. He was a friend of Ford’s and the latter asked Hamilton to give me a chance at acting if he had any bit parts to cast me in”. …
“Wayne did not meet Ford until after he began working at Fox which is indeed after he began working with Tom Mix as a propman, which easily puts the timeline into the last half of 1926, putting CAREFUL PLEASE way chronologically out of reach with its late 1925 production and it’s early February 1926 release date (Interestingly, she does not list CAREFUL PLEASE or any of Hamilton's 1926 releases in her list of potential candidates for a Wayne appearance in a Hamilton comedy). John Wayne’s memory regarding chronology and his career in interviews was usually pretty on target, so there is no reason to doubt his memory in the order of events, and even referring to Hamilton as Director rather than Producer doesn’t mean much as Hamilton was the star comedian with his own unit at Educational, with certainly a large degree of control over his films no matter who was listed as the Director. …
“I can add my own testimony as I met and spoke with Mr. Wayne several times in my life. I’m 6’8” tall, and when standing he came up reasonably close to eye-contact level. He was definitely around 6’ 4” tall.”
This is nothing more than theory posited by Mr. Roberts. I
have another theory that not only makes sense regarding when Wayne met Ford and
when Ford told Hamilton to put Wayne in front of the camera, but also readily
explains away Mr. Roberts’s theory. John Wayne himself said, “I finally got bit
parts in a few other films. Ham Hamilton was the director of those films. He
was a friend of Ford’s and the latter asked Hamilton to give me a chance at
acting, if he had any bit parts, to cast me in!” (as quoted in The Great Cowboy
Stars of Movies and Television” by Lee O. Miller, 1979).
We know that Wayne worked at other studios before (and
during) his time at Fox. WHAT IF he was working on a film
set, and was seen by Hamilton, and if Hamilton knew Ford, he may have mentioned
to Ford something like, "I saw this kid on a set, he looks like he may
look good on camera too"; and WHAT IF Ford then told Hamilton,
"Well, then put him in front of the camera as an extra in a few of your
shorts if you can find room for him, and let's see how he looks." WHAT
IF later Ford, or Hamilton mentioned this to Wayne. This would fit
perfectly with Wayne and Ford's accounts of meeting on Mother Machree (as Ford
would not have met Wayne at the time of this possible conversation), and it
would also fit Wayne's statement that Ford had asked Hamilton to put him in
front of the camera if Hamilton could find room for him. Wayne may have also
been noticed by Borzage and Mix, both of whom knew Ford, and they too may have
mentioned Wayne to Ford (all before Mother Machree) and these comments to Ford
by these different people MAY have influenced Ford to give
Wayne a shot on Mother Machree. While
I admit this is pure conjecture on my part, Mr. Roberts’s theory is also, at best,
pure conjecture.
Some, like Mr. Roberts, have relied on the words of John Ford when attempting to discern just exactly when Wayne and Ford met, and they use those words to determine if Wayne worked on any films prior to Mother Machree (and thus ignoring factual information in the process). It must be understood that John Ford was not always forthright and honest when it came to certain “facts.” We know that Ford gave himself credit for "discovering" John Wayne, but we also know that Wayne worked on other films before Ford had met him. We also know that Ford gave himself credit for a lot of things that he did not do, for example, "discovering" Monument Valley. Ford had not been there prior to Stagecoach in 1939, but we know that Wayne was there in 1929 herding horses into Monument Valley for the production of Lone Star Ranger (which, according to Wayne, he also appeared in as an extra - as did Ward Bond). So it is conceivable that Ford's “discovery" of John Wayne was actually prompted by comments made by many others who had seen and worked with Wayne prior to Mother Machree, especially in light of the films Wayne is known to have worked on prior to Mother Machree.
And please allow me a bit of skepticism here regarding your claim
to have “met and spoke with Mr. Wayne several times” in your life, Mr. Roberts.
Perhaps I am being overly kind, but you really do not look (at least in the
photos I have seen of you) to be old enough to have met and spoken with Mr.
Wayne several times in your life. I would hazard a guess that if you did meet
with him, you were at best a young teenager, and not likely 6’8” tall at that
time. I could be wrong, of course, but this is my observation.
Mr. Roberts attempts to discredit (albeit unknowingly) the
theory I have posited by stating, “And
one more correction, Lloyd Hamilton and John Ford were not close friends.
Checking again with my buddy Scott Eyman, who wrote the premiere book on John
Ford, PRINT THE LEGEND, just as he is now writing what will most likely be the
premiere book on John Wayne, in all of the voluminous correspondence, family
papers, and et all he went through in researching that book, Lloyd Hamilton’s
name did not come up once. At the same time, in researching Lloyd Hamilton,
which I have been doing for over thirty years, in all of the papers, photos,
personal correspondence et al I have gone through and or have in my personal
collection, not one mention of John Ford.”
Perhaps I missed something, but I don’t believe anyone
anywhere has stated that Lloyd Hamilton and John Ford were “close friends.”
John Wayne stated that Hamilton was “a friend of Ford’s.” He did not say “close
friend.” Be that as it may, however, Mr. Roberts’s statement that in all the “voluminous
correspondence, family papers, et all [sic]” of John Ford, and in “all of the
papers, photos, personal correspondence, et al” of Lloyd Hamilton, neither
mention each other. Mr. Roberts intimation here is that Ford and Hamilton
likely did not know each other at all. If this is true, Mr. Roberts, are saying
that John Wayne lied? That he was clearly mistaken? Interesting since you also
claim that John Wayne’s memory was usually “pretty
on target” and that “there is no
reason to doubt his memory”.
In all of this Mr. Roberts, you put forth a lot of theory
and opinion to disprove the idea that John Wayne appeared in Careful Please,
when all you really had to do was provide screen shots from your “razor-sharp”
print of Careful Please. Doing so would remove all doubt and give your position
a rock-solid foundation. And yet you have not done this. Instead you simply go
on and on talking up your theory and opinion, bolstered with unfounded theories
and opinions, and outright untruths. Miss Reid posted her screen shots to
support her theory, why don’t you? Perhaps you are unable or unwilling? Perhaps
you would rather provide those screen shots for a price. One would think a
self-anointed “film historian” and self-proclaimed “expert” such as yourself
would need to make some money somehow. I suppose this is as good a method as
any.
Not only does Mr. Roberts fail to provide documented
evidence to support his faulty theory, but he goes on to personally attack Miss
Reid. He states: “Ms. Elly Reid (the person who makes the claim to have spotted Wayne in
the film and is making the posts on the other group) first complains that she
is not allowed to rebut me on the silent comedy mafia newsgroup to begin with.
Oh well, I am not allowed to rebut her on that other minor silent comedy
newsgroup either, we all have our crosses to bear….”
Mr. Roberts goes on to put forth several sarcastic comments
such as Miss Reid was “told by God as
Gospel Truth and the Ghost of John Wayne who visited her in the wee hours of
the night and told her that he definitely appeared in CAREFUL PLEASE?” and,
Miss Reid’s belief that John Wayne appears in Careful Please as “CAREFUL PLEASE craziness”. Saying that
her opinion is nothing more than “the
hopes and meanderings of an obsessed Wayne fan with weak film history chops
hoping to make a name for herself” and Let me see if I can get the message out
in a more diplomatic form: ‘She’s Dreamin’, the Duke Ain’t There!’” Mr.
Roberts goes on to make a feeble attempt to support his verbal bullying by
further discrediting Miss Reid by saying: “Now
Ms. Reid is considering the possibility that John Wayne copied his walk from
Lloyd Hamilton? Okay, now we're talking big time clueless Wayne scholarship
here. Has she ever heard of Yakima Canutt?”
It amazes me that Mr. Roberts is claiming that he is a “film historian and collector of some reput
[sic]” as well as a researcher
engaged in helping his “buddy Scott Eyeman” (nice name dropping there, Mr.
Roberts) by “supplying him with research
material for his new book, which will likely be THE definitive book ever
written on John Wayne.” That Mr. Roberts is a film historian is not
something I can refute. Of course I cannot prove it either since the only
references I can find regarding his role as a film historian come straight from
him. His comment about Yakima Canutt clearly shows his lack of knowledge. Harry
Carey, Jr., a close friend of John Wayne for many years, has repeatedly stated
that it was Paul Fix who taught Wayne how to walk. Other long time friends have
gone on record saying that it was Wayne himself who invented the walk. Others
have said that it was Yakima Canutt who taught Wayne his distinctive walk. In other
words, there are many theories. Mr. Roberts, however, seems to indicate that he
possesses the truth about this. Perhaps (as Mr. Roberts has claimed about Miss
Reid) the ghost of John Wayne visited him in the wee hours and imparted this
special knowledge to him.
Mr. Roberts claims to be a collector of some repute. Of
course, ill repute is still repute, and if Mr. Roberts is helping Scott Eyeman
(again we have only Mr. Roberts word on this) to research “THE definitive book” on John Wayne, well, after experiencing Mr.
Roberts complete lack of knowledge regarding John Wayne, as well as his
non-existent research skills, both clearly evidenced in the repeated errors and
faulty conclusions put forth in his slew of comments, clearly Mr. Eyeman would
do well to reject anything Mr. Roberts says. Especially if he wants his book to
be definitive. Miss reid, on the other hand, is not just a member of the John
Wayne Fan Club. She is the owner of a massive collection of John Wayne material
(as am I), material I would venture to say that not many people, including Mr.
Roberts, have ever seen. She has been researching John Wayne for many years,
and I for one, value her research and opinions regarding John Wayne. Mr.
Roberts would do well to listen to Miss Reid, however, in doing so Mr. Roberts
would have to admit that he does not know everything. Something that Mr.
Roberts clearly could never admit to.
Contrary to Mr. Roberts statement that his opinion is “actually an informed opinion based on close visual inspection of the only surviving original print” of Careful Please, is simply nothing more than a self-aggrandizing statement. The simple fact that Mr. Roberts puts forth his opinion (as Miss Reid does), but does not provide visual evidence of his opinion (as Miss Reid did) shows me that Mr. Roberts is doing nothing more than spouting words. Mr. Roberts has always had the opportunity to rebut anything on my website via the contact form on my website. Yet he has not done so. Why? Because bullies require an audience and can never go toe-to-toe with someone who is both willing and able to stand up to them. Instead Mr. Roberts decided to attack Miss Reid behind a closed door in a forum that does not accept any new registrants, and where Miss Reid was unable to defend herself publicly. Bully for you Mr. Roberts. What a man you are. And in case my use of sarcasm escapes you here, let me put this a little more “diplomatically” to you. You, Mr. Roberts, are a 6’8”, 300+ pound coward. No more and no less.
If you should like to rebut or respond, please feel free to
do so. My website (and it is mine, and not Miss Reid’s) does have a contact
form. Any comments you would like to make will be posted on my website. If you
care to rebut, I invite it. If you care to respond, I invite it. And even if
you would simply like to throw a temper tantrum, rest assured I will post that
as well. You see, Mr. Roberts, I am not a female, your favorite target. And
although I am likely older than you, and I am not 6’8”, and I do not weigh in
excess of 300 pounds, to quote John Wayne, “on my worst day I could beat the
hell out of you.” So, if you have the intestinal fortitude (which I doubt) put
on your big boy pants and go toe-to-toe with me. I welcome it.
Sincerely,
Bob Tuttle
Owner of The New Frontier website, http://dukefanclub.weebly.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)